Prediction of Reese Stalder [] vs Ji Sung Nam [681st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W L L L L
Form
L W W L W W W L L LHead-2-Head: Stalder 1 - 0 Nam
They have played 2 sets in total, with Stalder winning 2 and Nam winning 0. The last match between Stalder and Nam was at the Taipei 2 Challenger, 20-10-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Reese Stalder getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Reese Stalder | 1 |
| Ji Sung Nam | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats 
Reese Stalder
Player
Ji Sung Nam
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:27:41 | Average Match Time | 1:27:41 |
| 52% (43/83) | 1st Serve % | 60% (41/68) |
| 63% (27/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (23/41) |
| 48% (19/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (10/27) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
| 51% (35/68) | Return Points Win % | 45% (37/83) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Reese Stalder vs Ji Sung Nam Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Stalder 1 - 0 Nam
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stalder has won 44.77% of points on their second serve, while Nam has won 33.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stalder, in recent form, has won 50.3% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nam has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.22% and 32.69% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stalder has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nam has saved 40.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stalder has won 20% of matches played (W/L 1/ 4), with Nam winning 50% (W/L 18/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stalder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 70/ 50), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 245/ 180), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Stalder has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4), where as Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 12/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stalder winning 1 times and Nam being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Stalder winning 2 and Nam winning 0. The last match between Stalder and Nam was at the Taipei 2 Challenger, 20-10-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Reese Stalder getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stalder and Nam have played a deciding set 0 times, with Stalder winning 0 times and Nam 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Stalder winning 0, and Nam 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stalder has played against opponents with an average rank of 194.4 while Nam has played against players with an average rank of 164.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stalder has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nam has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stalder has converted 41.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nam has converted 45.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Reese Stalder vs Ji Sung Nam Best Odds For The Match
Reese Stalder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Reese Stalder
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Reese Stalder
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
8
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Reese Stalder
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thanapet Chanta
Player
Reese Stalder
55%
(
54 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
51 of
106)
2
Aces
18
8
Double Faults
10
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Reese Stalder
Player
Ji Sung Nam
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Reese Stalder
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Reese Stalder
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Reese Stalder
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
19
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
25 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryo Tabata
Player
Ji Sung Nam
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Ryo Tabata
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Junhyun Lee
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Issei Okamura
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tai Sach
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Katsutoshi Suzuki
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
10 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Ji Sung Nam
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Stalder vs Nam?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Stalder Vs Nam is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (73/60) | Win/Loss | 56% (294/230) |
| 54% (159/136) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (660/527) |
| 52% (1455/1350) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5745/5248) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 284 | Aces Total | 974 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 141 | Total Double Faults | 914 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 169.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 186.85 |
| 59% (2311/3890) | 1st Serve % | 65% (13501/20725) |
| 68% (1579/2311) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9117/13501) |
| 50% (794/1579) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3511/7224) |
| 45% (131/288) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1081/2443) |
| 36% (1339/3671) | Return Points Win % | 43% (9265/21715) |
| 55% (72/130) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (286/512) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 46% (17/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (71/135) |
| 56% (18/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (68/144) |
| 93% (68/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (291/251) |
| 7% (68/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (291/40) |
| 15% (65/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (232/43) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
